When you machine plastic parts, choosing the wrong CNC strategy can double your cost, melt your surface finish, or even scrap an entire batch.
We’ve seen this happen many times in our own factory.
Last year, a customer switched from standard CNC to high-speed machining (HSM) for POM housings.
Result? Cycle time dropped 47% and scrap rate fell from 8% to 1.5%.
But here’s the truth:
High-speed CNC is NOT always better.
In this guide, we’ll share real production data, side-by-side comparisons, and a practical selection method to help you decide what actually works for your plastic parts.
High-speed CNC machining (HSM) uses:
Spindle: 20,000–40,000 RPM
Feed rate: 10–25 m/min
Small step-over cuts
Continuous toolpaths
Instead of “cutting hard", it cuts fast and light.
Plastic melts easily due to friction heat.
High-speed machining:
✅ reduces cutting force
✅ lowers heat concentration
✅ improves chip evacuation
✅ prevents burrs and deformation
This makes it especially effective for:
ABS
POM (Delrin)
Nylon
PMMA
PC
Standard CNC typically uses:
6,000–12,000 RPM
slower feed
deeper cuts
conventional toolpaths
It focuses on:
stability
cost control
general-purpose production
It’s still widely used for:
thick parts
low quantity
simple geometry
budget-sensitive orders
We tested both methods on the same part:
Material: POM
Size: 120*80*25 mm
Tolerance: ±0.02 mm
Qty: 1000 pcs
| Metric | High-Speed CNC | Standard CNC |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle time | 3.8 min | 7.2 min |
| Tool life | 11 hrs | 6 hrs |
| Surface roughness (Ra) | 0.8 μm | 1.9 μm |
| Scrap rate | 1.5% | 8% |
| Unit cost | $2.10 | $3.35 |
| Edge burrs | Very low | Frequent |
| Heat marks | None | Visible |
Even though HSM machines cost more,
total cost dropped 37% because:
fewer rejects
less polishing
faster throughput
For batch orders, speed wins.
Most buyers focus only on price.
But heat damage is the hidden cost.
Common issues we see:
melted edges
white stress marks
size drift
warped walls
sticky chips clogging tools
High-speed CNC reduces heat because:
smaller chip load
shorter contact time
faster chip removal
Less friction = cleaner parts
If your parts require:
optical finish
tight tolerance
thin walls
High-speed machining is usually safer.
Choose High-Speed CNC if you need:
✔ medium or large batch production (500+ pcs)
✔ tight tolerance (±0.02 mm or better)
✔ smooth cosmetic finish
✔ thin walls / complex curves
✔ engineering plastics (POM/PC/PEEK)
✔ faster delivery
medical devices
robotics
electronics housings
consumer products
drone parts
High-speed is not always necessary.
Standard CNC is better for:
✔ small quantities (<100 pcs)
✔ thick blocks
✔ simple geometry
✔ prototype testing
✔ budget-first projects
We produced 20 pieces of large HDPE blocks:
High-speed setup time: 2 hours
Actual cutting: 25 minutes
Standard CNC finished faster overall.
So for low volume, simpler setup wins.
<100 pcs → Standard
300 pcs → High-speed
±0.05 mm → Standard OK
±0.02 mm or tighter → High-speed recommended
hidden parts → Standard
visible/cosmetic → High-speed
low upfront → Standard
lowest unit price long-term → High-speed
Many suppliers quote only machining price.
But real cost includes:
polishing
scrap
rework
tool wear
delivery delay
In our production:
High-speed reduced:
polishing labor −60%
tool replacement −45%
delivery time −35%
This is why many B2B buyers switch after first trial.
No. Machine cost is higher, but unit cost is often lower for batch production.
Actually the opposite. Faster, lighter cuts generate less heat.
High-speed CNC.
Yes. Many factories rough with standard, finish with high-speed.